[Enter-Talk] Clarification Of Mma Honour Calculations
t/n: PLEASE KEEP THE COMMENT SECTION CIVILIZED!!
[enter-talk] ALBUM OF THE YEAR AWARD CALCULATIONS' RESULTS
I was certain inwards thinking that "EXO would hold upwards the 1 winning" but,

Votings for the album was supposed to hold upwards weighted at 30%
EXO had around 1,150,000 votes which is 100% of 300 points
BTS had roughly 840,000 votes which is 71% of 300 points
the maximum total of points you lot could earn from this was 300
EXO got 300
BTS got 219
Digital sales was weighted 70% of the full points
EXO was tertiary inwards damage of digital sales alongside 211,002,876 albums sold, which is roughly 71%
BTS came eighth alongside 112,484,727 albums sold which is roughly 38%
The maximum total of points you lot could earn was 700
EXO got 497 (adjusted alongside 0.47% deduction)
BTS got 266 (adjusted alongside 0.10% deduction)
EXO's total: 300+497=797/1000
BTS' total: 219+266=485/1000
People also kept mentioning Twice for winning creative someone of the year, but if you lot expect at the numbers alone it shouldn't hold upwards them but Zico

Solely based on digital charts, Zico should've won #1 because they were first, so accept 100% of the 700 points
EXO were tertiary as well as so they had 71.4% of the 700 points.
Based on this, Zico had 700 points as well as EXO had 500.29 points
Here's the votes calculation for creative someone of the year
EXO was 1st alongside 1.135.000 votes = 100% of the 300 points = 300 points
Zico was sixth alongside 63.209 points = 5.57% of the 300 signal = 16.71 points
EXO's full = 800.29
Zico's full = 716.71
I'm non writing this post service to swear at Bangtan, I'm writing this to present that Melon laurels did non mitt inwards the laurels fairly
Please refrain your criticism toward Bangtan as well as Army
[enter-talk] ALBUM OF THE YEAR AWARD CALCULATIONS' RESULTS
I was certain inwards thinking that "EXO would hold upwards the 1 winning" but,
Votings for the album was supposed to hold upwards weighted at 30%
EXO had around 1,150,000 votes which is 100% of 300 points
BTS had roughly 840,000 votes which is 71% of 300 points
the maximum total of points you lot could earn from this was 300
EXO got 300
BTS got 219
Digital sales was weighted 70% of the full points
EXO was tertiary inwards damage of digital sales alongside 211,002,876 albums sold, which is roughly 71%
BTS came eighth alongside 112,484,727 albums sold which is roughly 38%
The maximum total of points you lot could earn was 700
EXO got 497 (adjusted alongside 0.47% deduction)
BTS got 266 (adjusted alongside 0.10% deduction)
EXO's total: 300+497=797/1000
BTS' total: 219+266=485/1000
EXO won creative someone of the twelvemonth as well as this 1 was correct
People also kept mentioning Twice for winning creative someone of the year, but if you lot expect at the numbers alone it shouldn't hold upwards them but Zico
Solely based on digital charts, Zico should've won #1 because they were first, so accept 100% of the 700 points
EXO were tertiary as well as so they had 71.4% of the 700 points.
Based on this, Zico had 700 points as well as EXO had 500.29 points
Here's the votes calculation for creative someone of the year
EXO was 1st alongside 1.135.000 votes = 100% of the 300 points = 300 points
Zico was sixth alongside 63.209 points = 5.57% of the 300 signal = 16.71 points
EXO's full = 800.29
Zico's full = 716.71
I'm non writing this post service to swear at Bangtan, I'm writing this to present that Melon laurels did non mitt inwards the laurels fairly
Please refrain your criticism toward Bangtan as well as Army
post response:
[+1,032][-69]
master copy post: here
- ㅇㅇ 2016.11.20 13:05
- So what's the conclusion? EXO actually should've win Album of the year????
- 30920
- ㅇㅇ 2016.11.20 13:10
- Trueㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ this is daebak, I would've understood if in that place was a 10% deviation but they instantly upwards won #1
- 1001
- ㅇㅇ 2016.11.20 13:09
- I'm an EXO-L as well as I don't mean value that Bangtan nor the Army are at mistake here. It's the organization that was wrong
- 881
Posting Komentar untuk "[Enter-Talk] Clarification Of Mma Honour Calculations"